Agora Financial’s Rude Awakening

Jump to Comments

Dubai, UAE

• A ten-to-one bet we reached Peak Oil in May of 2005,
• Demand for crude leaves production in its wake,
• Blasphemy in the world’s oil windpipe and plenty more…

Joel Bowman, from the Arabian Gulf…

It may be blasphemous to ponder in a region that produces a good deal of the
world’s hydrocarbon-based energy, but what if Peak Oil has already occurred?

“My opinion is that it’s increasingly likely that we actually set an all-time
record in May 2005 of 74,252,000 barrels per day,” states Matt Simmons,
founder and chairman of the world’s largest energy investment banking
company, Simmons & Co. International.

“And for the first three months of 2007,” Simmons continues, “we were almost
a million barrels per day behind that, and we’re dropping fast. If that
record still holds a year from now, I’ll bet someone ten-to-one that we set
peak oil in May 2005 and it’s now past tense.”

Not one to shy away from a bet, Bud Conrad, chief economist at Casey Energy
Speculator and fellow Peak Oil enthusiast, plotted the following slightly
more inclusive chart to give us an idea of where we stand today.

As the graph clearly illustrates, world production has been on a rather
unimpressive plateau for the past couple of years. Part of this stagnation in
global output growth stems from the coughing, spluttering “chokepoints” that
we read about in the news every other day.

Just this past weekend we saw crude shoot up about four bucks on the back of
threats made by Venezuela’s head honcho, Hugo Chavez, that he may sever
export lines to the thirsty U.S. Then there was a decline in production in
Nigeria…troubles in the North Sea…ongoing issues in Iran…the “problem
with Putin”…the list goes on.

The thumbscrews are tightening for net oil importers. As we explained in
yesterday’s Rude, “The American SUV driver was a tad sluggish in his gait
this morning. Once again his pocketbook has been pinched. The hefty drive
from his suburban McMansion to work in the city and the heating in his
Connecticut vacation home just became a little more expensive.”

But the issues that face net-importing nations around the world may soon be
felt by the net-exporting nations too. Oil, as a finite commodity, will one
day dry up. The impetus for economies with a heavy oil hand to diversify,
therefore, is rather serious.

Consider that Abu Dhabi, capital of the UAE and one of the Middle East’s
largest crude exporters, has just pumped $15 billion into their Masdar Green
City initiative and one begins to understand just how seriously even the
crude rich nations are taking the issue of ultimate depletion.

In the following column, Bud sits down with Matt Simmons to root out some of
the grim realities emerging at the tail end of our petroleum age. This may
hurt a little…but we hope it also helps. Enjoy…

——– Energy & Scarcity Investor ——-

A California Energy Site So Secret, You Can’t Even See it Without a Top-Level U.S. Navy Clearance…

But a former Navy ‘insider’ is now ready to disclose the names of five
‘secret’ energy companies that could make you $372,340…

The Navy has already collected $194 million from this discovery.

And CNNMoney.com reports that ‘Investments in [this 'secret' energy sector]
jumped nearly four-fold over the last two years, to about $100 million last
year… Because it’s [still] so small, there’s large growth potential
here…’ Read Byron’s Report Right Here .

——————————————–

Empty Holes and Black Swans
Bud Conrad interviews Matt Simmons

Bud Conrad (BC): Let’s jump right into it. The Peak Oil issue certainly looks
ominous, and should be scary to more people than it seems to be.

Matt Simmons (MS): It ought to be. I don’t know if you read the National
Petroleum Council study that was released just last year…

BC: The IEA report too!

[Ed. Note: Matt Simmons is referring to the National Petroleum Council report
“Facing the Hard Truths about Energy,” released in, 2007, which was roundly
criticized as glossing over all the hard truths and replacing them with the
delusions of a Pollyanna mentality.

Bud is referring to the IEA mid-term report that came out around the same
time, claiming that oil demand will outstrip production causing a supply
crunch starting in 2010 that will worsen until 2012. The graph below shows
the IEA conclusions, with increasing demand growth represented by lines, and
diminishing supply growth represented by bars.)

MS: The IEA thing, basically, was good news. That’s the first huge change in
the mood of the IEA of finally being realistic that we have some unbelievable
problems. But you know what the major oil companies got wrong in this NPC
study? They basically didn’t understand that the peak oil people were talking
about flow rates. They thought we were talking about the ultimate resource
base, which is the funniest concept in the world.

BC: Let’s discuss that for clarification. We know that flow rates are what we
measure to understand whether we’re at peak or not. In M. King Hubbert’s
work, peak oil is calculated using the total resource base, but your point is
that we may still have oil that we’re just not able to produce in an economic
way.

MS: If it’s in the ground and you can barely get it out, it’s as irrelevant
as me looking out over Penobscot Bay and saying “There’s a vast amount of
hydrates about a thousand miles from here, a thousand feet underwater.” Well,
so what? That’s not useful energy.

BC: If it takes more energy to dig up that last barrel of oil than it
produces, then there’s no sense in trying.

MS: And another important concept is that if you’re lucky enough to find a
highly pressurized field and it turns out to be condensate, which is
sometimes called natural motor gasoline, you can literally bypass the
refinery – because it’s been baked in the ground – and put it right in your
car. It doesn’t run perfectly, but it runs. With the heavy oil out of Canada,
you have to expend energy to make it ooze out of the ground, and once it’s
oozed out of the ground, you still have totally unusable oil.

BC: You still have to go through a fairly hefty process…

MS: …of upgrading, and then finally diluting it with high-quality oil
before it can flow. So one is total junk oil, and the other is the Rolls
Royce of petroleum.

BC: The world needs to understand that we’ve been using up the Rolls Royces
first because they’re more available. The harder-to-find and harder-to-refine
stuff is what’s left. I think that’s misunderstood.

MS: Oh, it’s totally misunderstood. Sour, heavy oil is really not worth very
much.

BC: We’re probably in more serious a situation than most people would
realize, and it’s no better with natural gas. Switching gears for a moment,
do you think the rise of LNG will be enough to keep up with declines in
natural gas discovery and subsequently in natural gas production?

MS: Well, first of all, the problem with LNG is that if we try to develop a
spot market out of LNG, the odds of it ending in bankruptcy are about 90%.

BC: Who goes bankrupt?

MS: All the players. The cost to produce and distribute LNG is so high that
to make LNG work in any sort of financial reality, you would need a 25- or
30-year guaranteed supply. And then you can amortize it over 25 or 30 years.
If you’re going on a spot supply, you’ve got to write it off over 10 years
and then you’ll need $40 per million BTU to make the economics work. The
other thing is that about 35% of the hydrocarbon value gets chewed up in the
process of cryogenically freezing natural gas, transporting it, and then re-
gassing it.

BC: In your opinion then, LNG is not an economically viable solution. We
won’t do it.

MS: We shouldn’t do it. But it turns out that high-quality natural gas –
sweet, high-quality natural gas – is just like sweet oil. It’s basically in
decline.

BC: And therefore also harder to find, despite our original hope of about a
decade ago. Clean energy was going to fix everything through natural gas for
electricity and everything else.

MS: Yes, and using natural gas for electricity turned out to be an
unbelievably stupid decision. Using electricity for heat was equally stupid.
Natural gas should be refined to one use and one use only, and that’s
creating instantaneous and high-efficiency heat.

BC: In one of your presentations, you have a very memorable clip of a ration
book from World War II. Are we headed towards rationing and if so, between
here and there, what are your estimates on what the price of energy might do,
especially if we’re hit by any ugly political events?

MS: I try to stay agnostic about political events because they’re
unpredictable. If you took a blackboard and filled it up with every political
event that could impact the supply of energy, not a single one of them is
positive. All political events are just unforeseen black swans.

[Joel's Note: Stay tuned for Part II of Bud’s interview with Matt Simmons in
tomorrow’s edition of your Rude Awakening. Matt shares some insight as to
what he sees as the major investment themes and opportunities looking to
squeeze some profits out of the great global energy crunch. If you’re
interested in learning more about how you can be on the RIGHT side of the
next wave of energy-related trades, you could do much worse than checking out
the Casey Energy Speculator. They’re running a risk-free three month trial
at the moment, so it’s definately worth a look.

Send your comments and questions along to us here and we’ll be back tomorrow…

Cheers,

Joel Bowman
Rude Awakening